EPC vs EPCM

Wednesday, March 09, 2011

EPC / EPCM Definition & Comparison:


Many different terms are tossed around the construction industry loosely describing the different methodology used to design and construct new facilities and turnarounds. Unfortunately, there are no tried and true definitions for the different methods and numerous variations of each of the most popular methods.

Determining the correct form of construction contract to pursue can have a great effect on the cost and risk associated with the construction project. The cost of construction varies inversely with the amount of business risk the “owner / financers” are willing to accept. The less business risk the owner wishes to assume, the higher the cost of construction and management. This follows the “risk-reward” motto for business.

The two most common types of construction contacts are EPC “turn-key” and EPCM. Each of these methods have variations that can be adapted to each project as needed; example (EPCC Engineering, Procurement, Construction, and Commissioning, EPCI Engineering, Procurement, Construction, and Installation), etc.

EPC (Engineering, Procurement and Construction): means the company is contracted to provide engineering, procurement and construction services by the owner. Think Design & Construct style contracts, where the project is largely Contractor managed and the cost risk and control are weighted towards the Contractor and away from the Owner. The EPC contractor has direct contracts with the construction contractors.

EPCM (Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management)
: means the company is contracted to provide engineering, procurement and construction management services. Other companies are contracted by the Owner directly to provide construction services and they are usually managed by the EPCM contractor on the Owner's behalf. Think Professional Services contracts, where the project is largely Owner managed and the cost risk and control is weighted towards the Owner.

EPC and EPCM contracting are both very prevalent types of contracts within the construction industry. Dependent on the level of risk the Owner of a project is willing to accept, budget constraints, and the Owner’s organization core competencies, will determine which method is best for their project.
EPC contracting tends to be more expensive, to the Owner, due to the shift of project risk away from the Owner and to the EPC Contractor. On average, a project’s cost 10% - 20% more using EPC style of contracting than a project using the EPCM style of contracting. This is due in large part to the project’s risk being more evenly distributed between the Owner and contracts / suppliers.

Construction contracting trends have been leaning towards the EPCM style of contracting and away from EPC contracting for several reasons but both methods have their place in business today.

EPCM Advantages:
  • Lower Overall Cost
  • Staff’s Sense of Ownership
  • More Control over Process
  • Better for less defined projects with anticipated changes to scope of supply
  • Less Legal Litigation (Identify issues early and remedy situation before larger problems arise)
  • Owner’s Financing Flexibility

These are just a few of the advantages of EPCM style of construction contracting.

EPC contracting has it place in the construction industry as well. Under certain situations, it makes better sense to use this type of construction contracting than other methods.

EPC Advantages:
  • One Stop Shopping "One point of Contact"
  • "Hands off" approach to project
  • Minimal Staffing Requirements
  • Minimal Legal Risk
  • Best for Well defined projects with Detailed Engineering Complete before EPC Contractor selected (Minimal Unknowns).

As stated before, these construction contract methods can be tailored to the individual projects / owner’s needs. Some companies can go as far as breaking up each portion of the EPC / EPCM (Engineering, Procurement, Construction / Construction Management) to separate companies. One company can do the engineering; another can do the procurement, while still another can do the construction / project management).

Each company must decide for themselves, with the advice of legal and financial counsels, as to which method of construction contracting is best for their particular project and situation.


souce: http://prodigyengr.com

Trans-Asia, NorAsian Energy sign farm-in agreement

Sunday, February 06, 2011

MANILA, Philippines - Trans-Asia Oil and Energy Development Corp. and NorAsian Energy Ltd (NEL) signed yesterday a farm-in agreement in service contract 55 in offshore Palawan.

In a disclosure to the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE), TA Oil said NorAsian acquired an 8.18% participating interest in the service contract.

TA Oil did not disclose how much was the acquisition deal for the said shares.

In late 2009, TA Oil started with its data gathering at the SC 55 in West Palawan.

The SC 55 consortium commenced a 590-square kilometer 3D seismic survey in its contract area in offshore West Palawan . TA Oil has a 15% participating interest in SC 55.

SC 55 covers 9,000km2 in the south west Palawan Basin. It is located on a regional oil and gas fairway that extends from the productive Borneo offshore region in the southwest to the offshore Philippines production assets northwest of Palawan .

Aside from TA Oil, Otto Energy owns an 85% working interest in SC55. Otto Energy Ltd., an Australian oil and gas firm holds the remaining 85% of the contract. Otto acquired its 85% interest in SC55 in 2006, through the purchase of NorAsian Energy Ltd. Otto Energy was supposed to farm-out 60% of its interest in SC 55 to BHP Billiton Petroleum Pty. Ltd. but negotiations fell through.

TA Oil is the energy arm of the Phinma Group. The company continues to be active in several exploration projects, particularly in large and high-potential areas. At present, the company is represented in 4 service contracts.

By Donnabelle L. Gatdula, The Philippine Star
Posted at 02/05/2011

2011: A Year of Opportunity

Friday, January 21, 2011

Jan 19, 2011 - 2011 may go down in history as "The Year of Opportunity." Venture capitalist Saku Tuominen, founder of the Idealist Group, says in the Monocle Small Business Guide 2010/11, "The world is more connected than ever before and production costs, especially on the digital side, are falling dramatically. With a good idea, great implementation and the right timing, practically anybody can challenge anyone these days. Never in the history of mankind have there been so many opportunities for small companies."



The GEDI (Global Entrepreneurship & Development Index) is helping by measuring how fast the global entrepreneurial society is spreading. By focusing on the "three As" of entrepreneurial development -- attitudes, activity and aspiration -- the GEDI can help determine what the right time and place is to launch a new business.


I for one have decided that this year is the year to launch and build a business that moves beyond the single-shingle, band-of-one, solo-adviser business model. Am I happy with what Seth Godin termed a shipping list for 2010? Sure, but I know that if I'm simply twice as bold, I can double my impact on the world. And to leave that potential on the table is, well, wrong. I know I can make a difference; it's now a matter of scale and scope. I have committed to bringing Shibumi Creative Works into the world, and help companies struggling with design-driven innovation find their way.


Risky, daunting, difficult? Yes, yes, and yes. Is it a mistake -- is failure possible, or even probable? It's not a question worth considering, much less spending energy on answering. Why? Because it may just be the best mistake I've ever made.


I'm taking a lesson from James Dyson, founder of Dyson, who explains in the same issue of Monocle: "I'm an engineer. And given that I've spent my career making mistakes, some would say I'm not a very good one. It's the best way to learn and we should encourage young people to make more mistakes. Don't be afraid to take risks -- or to swear like a trooper when things don't go your way. Just make sure you learn why for next time."


What would you do if you were twice as bold? Whatever your answer, make 2011 the year you do it!


source: American Express OPEN Forum

Read more...

New York state regulators green-light $1.4B Queens power plant

State utilities regulators gave final approval on Thursday for the construction of a $1.4 billion power plant in Astoria, Queens. Now, the company that plans to build it needs to find a buyer for the electricity it will generate.

The Public Service Commission said the plant would replace an older, less-efficient plant.

It would be built in two phases over four years on a 15-acre section of Consolidated Edison’s 600-acre property on the East River that has long been the city’s hub of electricity generation.

Read more...

10 Ways To Get A Job With Help Of Social Media

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Everyone’s talking about using social media for job-hunting. But how, exactly, should you do that?

Here are 10 Ways To Get A Job With Help Of Social Media using three popular online tools: Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.

Let people know you’re looking.

Whether on LinkedIn, Facebook, or Twitter, let your friends and followers know that you’re looking for a job. Even better, tell them what type of job you’re looking for. They may not know of any openings right now, but if they know you’re available, they’ll think of you when a position opens up. That will help you hear about openings before they’re listed on popular job boards.

Read more...

  © Blogger template Writer's Blog by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP